2562
Comment:
|
2438
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 10: | Line 10: |
* Never used: '''59%''' * Some simulation work: '''10%''' * Some experimental work: '''24%''' |
* Never used: '''57%''' * Some simulation work: 21% * Some experimental work: 14% |
Line 14: | Line 14: |
* N/A: 0% | |
Line 18: | Line 17: |
* 3: 0% * 4: '''21%''' * 5: '''79%''' |
* 3: 7% * 4: '''43%''' * 5: '''50%''' |
Line 22: | Line 21: |
* Yes: '''37%''' * No: '''48%''' * N/A: 14% |
* Yes: '''42%''' * No: 29% * N/A: 29% |
Line 26: | Line 25: |
* EEG: '''66%''' * MEG: '''55%''' * MEG+EEG: '''34%''' * NIRS: 0% * sEEG/ECoG: 7% * Scripting: 14% * Pre-processing: '''48%''' * Visualization of recordings: '''59%''' * Source analysis: '''52%''' * Time-frequency: '''52%''' * Functional connectivity: '''45%''' * Statistics: '''48%''' * Research: '''52%''' * Clinical applications: 7% * Epilepsy: 7% * Baby / infant studies: 3% |
* EEG: '''92%''' * MEG: 14% * MEG+EEG: 7% * NIRS: 7% * sEEG/ECoG: 0% * Scripting: 21% * Pre-processing: '''29%''' * Visualization of recordings: '''36%''' * Source analysis: '''64%''' * Time-frequency: '''57%''' * Functional connectivity: '''64%''' * Statistics:''' 29%''' * Research:''' 57%''' * Clinical applications: '''29%''' * Epilepsy: 14% * Baby / infant studies: 14% |
Line 79: | Line 78: |
1. 2 1 3 3 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 4 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1. 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 1. 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 1 1 2 |
1. 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 4 1 3 1. 5 4 5 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 1. 2 0 2 2 1 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 2 2 |
Brainstorm workshop survey: Florence 2013
Selected comments from attendees:
- ""
Survey results
Number of participants: 40
Number of returned documents: 14 (35%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
Never used: 57%
- Some simulation work: 21%
- Some experimental work: 14%
Experienced user: 7%
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1: 0%
- 2: 0%
- 3: 7%
4: 43%
5: 50%
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
Yes: 42%
- No: 29%
- N/A: 29%
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
EEG: 92%
- MEG: 14%
- MEG+EEG: 7%
- NIRS: 7%
- sEEG/ECoG: 0%
- Scripting: 21%
Pre-processing: 29%
Visualization of recordings: 36%
Source analysis: 64%
Time-frequency: 57%
Functional connectivity: 64%
Statistics: 29%
Research: 57%
Clinical applications: 29%
- Epilepsy: 14%
- Baby / infant studies: 14%
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
Good pace and clarity: 14
- A bit rushed in the afternoon: 3
- A bit too fast in general: 2
- A bit too slow in the morning: 1
Missing topics and requests
- Processing EEG data / ERPs: 3
- More on statistics: 2
- More on forward/inverse modeling: 1
- Would have been better with Neuromag data / FIF files: 1
Missing tools in Brainstorm
- Better stats: 3
- Development of the functional connectivity: 2
- More pre-processing: filters, different types of artifacts: 1
- Beamformers: 1
- MEG/EEG + fMRI: 1
- Typing the coordinates in the MRI viewer: 1
Technical issues
- Out of memory issues: 5
- Importing the MRI
- SSP computation
Results analysis
Results encoding
- 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
- How helpful: 1(worst) to 5(best), 0=N/A
- Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A
Results values
- 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 4 1 3
- 5 4 5 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 4
- 2 0 2 2 1 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 2 2