⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2013-02-18 17:05:03
4864
Comment:
|
3932
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 6: | Line 6: |
Number of participants: '''40'''<<BR>>Number of returned documents: '''30 '''(75%)<<BR>>[[attachment:workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document]]. | Number of participants: '''40'''<<BR>>Number of returned documents: '''30 '''(75%)<<BR>>[[attachment:workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document|&do=get]]. |
Line 10: | Line 10: |
* Never used: 45% * Some simulation work: 10% * Some experimental work: 31% * Experience user: 7% * N/A: 7% 1. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(best) to 5(worst) * 1: 52% * 2: 26% * 3: 12% * 4: 7% * 5: 0% * N/A: 2% |
* Never used: * Some simulation work: * Some experimental work: * Experience user: * N/A: 1. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best) * 1: * 2: * 3: * 4: * 5: * N/A: |
Line 23: | Line 23: |
* Yes: 52% * No: 40% * N/A: 7% 1. Was today's presentation by other Brainstorm researchers useful in better understanding how to apply the software? * Yes: 67% * No: 24% * N/A: 10% 1. Immediate plans for using Brainstorm: * Yes: 57% * No: 0% * N/A: 43% 1. Particularly enthusiastic responses (explicit congratulations, encouragement messages, many exclamation marks, smileys): * Yes: 26% |
* Yes: * No: * N/A: |
Line 41: | Line 31: |
1. User presentations are useful: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A 1. Future use: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A 1. Extra enthusiasm: 1=No, 2=Yes |
|
Line 46: | Line 33: |
1. 2 4 1 1 3 3 1 1 3 1 3 4 1 1 3 1 1 3 2 2 1 3 0 1 1 3 3 3 2 3 1 1 1 3 0 3 1 1 0 1 4 1 1. 3 1 3 2 1 4 1 1 1 2 1 0 1 4 1 2 2 3 2 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 2 4 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1. 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 2 1 1. 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 0 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1. 0 2 0 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 1. 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 |
1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1. 4 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 3 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 5 1. 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 0 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 1 1 |
Brainstorm workshop survey: Halifax 2013
Selected comments from attendees:
"
Survey results
Number of participants: 40
Number of returned documents: 30 (75%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
- Never used:
- Some simulation work:
- Some experimental work:
- Experience user:
- N/A:
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1:
- 2:
- 3:
- 4:
- 5:
- N/A:
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
- Yes:
- No:
- N/A:
Results encoding
- 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
- How helpful: 1(best) to 5(worst), 0=N/A
- Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A
Results values
- 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1
- 4 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 3 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 5
- 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 0 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 1 1
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
Pace:
Very good pace: 7
- A bit rushed at some moments: 2
- Too slow at some moments: 3
- Too much time spent on sensors overview / pre-processing: 2
- Questions from the audience should be taken at the end of each phase: 1
Structure:
- Two-day workshop: 2
- One-week workshop (SPM-like): 1
- Two groups for people with different backgrounds: 1
- Follow-up training with priority to today's participants: 1
- Some time for having people use their own data: 2
User presentations:
Should be more related to the software and methods, how the analysis were performed: 9
Waiting too long before starting the practice / presentations should be after the practice: 3
- Less presentations: 2
- Presentations are not necessary in a one-day workshop: 1
Technical issues:
- Graphic cards problems: 2
- Computer was too slow: 1
Missing topics and requests
More statistics / group analysis: 7
More methodological details, good practice & cooking recipes: 5
More connectivity: 3
- Scripting: 2
- Preparation of the MRI: 2
- EEG analysis: 2
- Medical applications: 1
- Baby/infant MEG analysis: 1
- More time-frequency: 1
- Forward and inverse modeling: 1
- Other source reconstruction methods: 1
- More scientific background for less experienced MEG users: 1
- How to handle multiple runs: 1
- Creating structure of data to plug in already processed data: 1
Missing tools in Brainstorm
- ANOVA, clustering analysis: 1
- Yokogawa MEG160 support: 1
Planning to use Brainstorm specifically for:
Connectivity: 10
Source reconstruction: 5
Pre-processing: 4
- EEG: 7
- MEG: 5
- Baby/infant: 3
- Epilepsy: 2
- Time-frequency: 2
- Comparison with Matti's MNE: 1
Comments about the survey questions
- First question: 1(best) and 5(worst):
Very counter-intuitive given the amount of people who wrote 5 saying then "Amazing workshop!" => Converting to ones
- 4 values with no comments are difficult to interpret
- Question about the tutorials:
- Not easy to understand given the number off-subject responses
- Maybe we should add a question about the quality of the online tutorials, not the comparison with the class
- Question about the future use of Brainstorm:
- Too many people didn't write anything, it was probably too open
- Maybe we should offer a multiple choice. What are you planning to use Brainstorm for: EEG, MEG, pre-processing, source analysis, time-frequency, connectivity, clinical, research, simulation...