3932
Comment:
|
3277
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 6: | Line 6: |
Number of participants: '''40'''<<BR>>Number of returned documents: '''30 '''(75%)<<BR>>[[attachment:workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document|&do=get]]. | Number of participants: '''40'''<<BR>>Number of returned documents: '''31 '''(78%)<<BR>>[[attachment:workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document|&do=get]]. |
Line 10: | Line 10: |
* Never used: * Some simulation work: * Some experimental work: * Experience user: * N/A: |
* Never used: '''90%''' * Some simulation work: '''3%''' * Some experimental work: '''3%''' * Experienced user: '''4%''' * N/A: '''3%''' |
Line 16: | Line 16: |
* 1: * 2: * 3: * 4: * 5: * N/A: |
* 1: '''0%''' * 2: '''0%''' * 3: '''6%''' * 4: '''61%''' * 5: '''32%''' |
Line 23: | Line 22: |
* Yes: * No: * N/A: |
* Yes: '''42%''' * No: '''52%''' * N/A: '''6%''' |
Line 27: | Line 26: |
=== Results encoding === 1. 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA 1. How helpful: 1(best) to 5(worst), 0=N/A 1. Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A |
|
Line 32: | Line 27: |
=== Results values === 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1. 4 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 3 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 5 1. 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 0 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 1 1 |
|
Line 100: | Line 91: |
== Comments about the survey questions == * First question: 1(best) and 5(worst): * Very counter-intuitive given the amount of people who wrote 5 saying then "Amazing workshop!" => Converting to ones * 4 values with no comments are difficult to interpret * Question about the tutorials: * Not easy to understand given the number off-subject responses * Maybe we should add a question about the quality of the online tutorials, not the comparison with the class * Question about the future use of Brainstorm: * Too many people didn't write anything, it was probably too open * Maybe we should offer a multiple choice. What are you planning to use Brainstorm for: EEG, MEG, pre-processing, source analysis, time-frequency, connectivity, clinical, research, simulation... |
== Results analysis == === Results encoding === 1. 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA 1. How helpful: 1(best) to 5(worst), 0=N/A 1. Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A === Results values === 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1. 4 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 3 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 5 1. 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 0 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 1 1 |
Brainstorm workshop survey: Halifax 2013
Selected comments from attendees:
"
Survey results
Number of participants: 40
Number of returned documents: 31 (78%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
Never used: 90%
Some simulation work: 3%
Some experimental work: 3%
Experienced user: 4%
N/A: 3%
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
1: 0%
2: 0%
3: 6%
4: 61%
5: 32%
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
Yes: 42%
No: 52%
N/A: 6%
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
Pace:
Very good pace: 7
- A bit rushed at some moments: 2
- Too slow at some moments: 3
- Too much time spent on sensors overview / pre-processing: 2
- Questions from the audience should be taken at the end of each phase: 1
Structure:
- Two-day workshop: 2
- One-week workshop (SPM-like): 1
- Two groups for people with different backgrounds: 1
- Follow-up training with priority to today's participants: 1
- Some time for having people use their own data: 2
User presentations:
Should be more related to the software and methods, how the analysis were performed: 9
Waiting too long before starting the practice / presentations should be after the practice: 3
- Less presentations: 2
- Presentations are not necessary in a one-day workshop: 1
Technical issues:
- Graphic cards problems: 2
- Computer was too slow: 1
Missing topics and requests
More statistics / group analysis: 7
More methodological details, good practice & cooking recipes: 5
More connectivity: 3
- Scripting: 2
- Preparation of the MRI: 2
- EEG analysis: 2
- Medical applications: 1
- Baby/infant MEG analysis: 1
- More time-frequency: 1
- Forward and inverse modeling: 1
- Other source reconstruction methods: 1
- More scientific background for less experienced MEG users: 1
- How to handle multiple runs: 1
- Creating structure of data to plug in already processed data: 1
Missing tools in Brainstorm
- ANOVA, clustering analysis: 1
- Yokogawa MEG160 support: 1
Planning to use Brainstorm specifically for:
Connectivity: 10
Source reconstruction: 5
Pre-processing: 4
- EEG: 7
- MEG: 5
- Baby/infant: 3
- Epilepsy: 2
- Time-frequency: 2
- Comparison with Matti's MNE: 1
Results analysis
Results encoding
- 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
- How helpful: 1(best) to 5(worst), 0=N/A
- Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A
Results values
- 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1
- 4 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 3 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 5
- 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 0 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 1 1