2380
Comment:
|
2548
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 3: | Line 3: |
* Thank you | * Thank you! * Very clear! The UI and apparent robustness of the software helped a lot with clarity. * Excellent! * Lot of information, but well paced. * Pace was goo and easy to follow. * Answered all questions clearly. * Well paced, relatively easy to keep pace, even as a beginner user. |
Line 47: | Line 53: |
* '''Good clarity:''' '''4''' * '''Good pace: 4''' * A bit slow: 1 * A bit fast: * Need more time / two days: 1 * Some topics were not covered as advertised: 1 |
* '''Good clarity: 16''' * '''Good pace: 12''' * A bit slow: 3 * Uneven pace: 1 * Need more short breaks: 1 * Too much time on personal questions: 1 * Some advertised topics were not covered: 2 * Need more time / two days: 2 |
Line 55: | Line 63: |
* Resting state: * Interface with command line Matlab: 1 * More on statistics: * More on scripting: * More on connectivity: * Group analysis: * PAC: * Filtering: * Writing plugin modules: * Export NIfTI files: |
* Connectivity: 3 * EEG examples (digitizer, ECoG positions): 3 * EEG/SEEG examples (recordings): 3 * Interface with command line Matlab: 2 * More on frequency analysis: 1 |
Line 67: | Line 70: |
* '''Beamforming: ''' * '''More statistics: ''' * Head motion detection and correction: * More connectivity measures: * Child template: |
* Integration with fMRI: 2 |
Line 73: | Line 72: |
== Technical issues == * |
Brainstorm workshop survey: Los Angeles 2015
Selected comments from attendees
- Thank you!
- Very clear! The UI and apparent robustness of the software helped a lot with clarity.
- Excellent!
- Lot of information, but well paced.
- Pace was goo and easy to follow.
- Answered all questions clearly.
- Well paced, relatively easy to keep pace, even as a beginner user.
Survey results
Number of participants: 24
Number of returned documents: 19 (79%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
Never used: 68%
- Some simulation work: 5%
- Some experimental work: 27%
- Experienced user: 0%
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1: 0%
- 2: 0%
- 3: 10%
- 4: 16%
5: 74%
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
- Yes: 68%
- No: 32%
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
- EEG: 100%
- MEG: 21%
- MEG+EEG: 10%
- NIRS: 10%
- sEEG/ECoG: 10%
- Scripting: 32%
- Pre-processing: 68%
- Visualization of recordings: 74%
- Source analysis: 68%
- Time-frequency: 63%
- Functional connectivity: 47%
- Statistics: 63%
- Research: 74%
- Clinical applications: 21%
- Epilepsy: 10%
- Baby / child studies: 5%
- Real-time DSP/reporting/viz: 5%
- fMRI: 5%
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
Good clarity: 16
Good pace: 12
- A bit slow: 3
- Uneven pace: 1
- Need more short breaks: 1
- Too much time on personal questions: 1
- Some advertised topics were not covered: 2
- Need more time / two days: 2
Missing topics and requests
- Connectivity: 3
- EEG examples (digitizer, ECoG positions): 3
- EEG/SEEG examples (recordings): 3
- Interface with command line Matlab: 2
- More on frequency analysis: 1
Missing tools in Brainstorm
- Integration with fMRI: 2
Results analysis
Results encoding
- 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
- How helpful: 1(worst) to 5(best), 0=N/A
- Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A
Results values
- 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 2 1 1 3 3 1
- 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 3 3 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5
- 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1