MEG@McGill Training Program 2015: Survey

Full week training to learn everything about MEG: paradigm design, acquisition and advanced data analysis.

Survey results

Number of participants: 12
Number of returned documents: 12 (100%)

Summary

1. Overall, how did the training program meet your expectations?
   • Poor: 0%
   • Fair: 0%
   • Good: 16%

   • Excellent: 83%

2. How would you rate the first day of lectures?
   • Poor: 0%
   • Fair: 16%

   • Good: 58%

   • Excellent: 25%

3. How would you rate the hands-on part of the program?
   • Poor: 0%
   • Fair: 0%
   • Good: 8%

   • Excellent: 92%

4. What did you like the best (multiple choice)?
   • Support: 58%
   • Food: 16%
   • Weather: 0%

   • Expertise of the team: 100%

5. Would you recommend the training to your collaborators and colleagues?

   • Yes: 100%

   • No: 0%

Comments and suggestions

The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.

• Notify the accepted participants in advance: 2
• Prepare the groups in advance: 1
• Lecture day too advanced and too specific / would be better to extend training: 2
• Add lecture on differences EEG/MEG: 1
• More guidance/time in experiment design: 2
• Less time in experiment design: 1
• More time to test the paradigm before the acquisition: 1
• More time for advanced analysis (explain theory/parameters): 4
• Individual sessions with participants to answer specific research questions: 2
• Room too small: 1