2703
Comment:
|
1122
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 11: | Line 11: |
* Poor: * Fair: * Good: * Excellent: |
* Poor: 0% * Fair: 0% * Good: 9% * '''Excellent: 91%''' |
Line 16: | Line 16: |
* Poor: * Fair: * Good: * Excellent: |
* Poor: 0% * Fair: 0% * '''Good: 73%''' * '''Excellent: 27%''' |
Line 21: | Line 21: |
* Poor: * Fair: * Good: * Excellent: |
* Poor: 0% * Fair: 0% * Good: 0% * '''Excellent: 100%''' |
Line 26: | Line 26: |
* Support: * Food: * Weather: * Expertise of the team: <<BR>> 1. Would you recommend the training to your collaborators and colleagues?<<BR>> * EEG: 89% * MEG: 41% * MEG+EEG: 18% * NIRS: 18% * sEEG/ECoG: 11% * Scripting: 26% * Pre-processing: 37% * Visualization of recordings: 41% * Source analysis: 86% * Time-frequency: 63% * Functional connectivity: 44% * Statistics: 22% * Research: 59% * Clinical applications: 7% * Epilepsy: 0% * Baby / infant studies: 0% * BCI: 4% |
* Support: 54% * Food: 19% * Weather: 0% * '''Expertise of the team: 100%''' 1. Would you recommend the training to your collaborators and colleagues? * '''Yes: 100%''' * No: 0% |
Line 53: | Line 37: |
=== Comments about the workshop === * '''Good clarity: 12''' * '''Too fast at moments: 8 ''' * '''Too fast in general: 6''' * '''Good pace: 5 ''' * '''Too much for one day: 5 ''' * Good structure: 1 * More exercices, less demo: 1 |
=== Missing in the program: === * |
Line 62: | Line 40: |
=== Missing topics and requests === * More discussions on the methods/parameters: 4 * Introduction to MEG: 1 * Theoretical background for all the steps: 1 * Importing pre-processed data: 2 * Export data to other programs: 1 * Combined MEG+EEG: 1 * More on statistics: 3 * More on scripting: 1 * More on source localization: 1 * Better overview of the software interface: 1 * Shorter software introduction: 1 === Missing tools in Brainstorm === * Interpolation of bad channels: 1 * Real-time analysis: 1 * Statistics: 4 * ICA : 1 * NIRS: 1 * Source estimation of TF data: 1 == Technical issues == * '''Out of memory errors with Win 32bit''' == Results analysis == === Results encoding === 1. 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA 1. How helpful: 1(worst) to 5(best), 0=N/A 1. Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A === Results values === 1. 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 5 4 5 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 5 4 0 4 5 4 4 4 5 0 4 4 4 4 4 1. 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 0 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 2 1 1 |
=== Suggested improvements: === * |
MEG@McGill Training Program 2015: Survey
Full week training to learn everything about MEG: paradigm design, acquisition and advanced data analysis.
Survey results
Number of participants: 12
Number of returned documents: 11 (90%)
Summary
- Overall, how did the training program meet your expectations?
- Poor: 0%
- Fair: 0%
- Good: 9%
Excellent: 91%
- How would you rate the first day of lectures?
- Poor: 0%
- Fair: 0%
Good: 73%
Excellent: 27%
- How would you rate the hands-on part of the program?
- Poor: 0%
- Fair: 0%
- Good: 0%
Excellent: 100%
- What did you like the best (multiple choice)?
- Support: 54%
- Food: 19%
- Weather: 0%
Expertise of the team: 100%
- Would you recommend the training to your collaborators and colleagues?
Yes: 100%
- No: 0%
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Missing in the program: