Brainstorm workshop survey: Neuro 2012
Survey results
Number of participants: 40
Number of returned documents: 15 (38%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
Never used: 87%
Some simulation work: 0%
Some experimental work: 13%
Experienced user: 0%
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
1: 0%
2: 0%
3: 13%
4: 40%
5: 47%
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
Yes: 33%
No: 67%
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
EEG: 53%
MEG: 93%
MEG+EEG: 40%
NIRS: 13%
sEEG/ECoG: 7%
Scripting: 7%
Pre-processing: 20%
Visualization of recordings: 47%
Source analysis: 67%
Time-frequency: 73%
Functional connectivity: 60%
Statistics: 40%
Research: 80%
Clinical applications: 13%
Epilepsy: 13%
Baby / infant studies: 7%
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
- Very good pace: 9
- A bit slow: 1
- A bit fast: 4
- Too much info / split in two days: 4
- Should tell the people to bring a mouse: 1
- Give a printed version of the program / analysis steps: 1
Missing topics and requests
- Statistics: 1
- More EEG / ERPs: 3
- More example of studies: 1
- More connectivity: 1
- More about source localization techniques: 1
- Group analysis: 1
Missing tools in Brainstorm
- p-values in connectivity analysis: 2
- Video tutorials on the website: 1
- Phase-synchrony analysis: 1
- Multi-variate Granger causality: 1
- Multi-subject loops from the GUI: 1
- Intra-cranial EEG: 1
- Time-variant connectivity measures: 1
Results analysis
Results encoding
- 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
- How helpful: 1(best) to 5(worst), 0=N/A
- Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A
Results values
- 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
- 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 3 3 5 5 4
- 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1