⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2013-02-18 21:51:21
3804
Comment:
|
1837
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 1: | Line 1: |
= Brainstorm workshop survey: Halifax 2013 = | = Brainstorm workshop survey: Neuro 2012 = |
Line 3: | Line 3: |
* ''"Really clear and well paced. Good job!"'' * ''"Pace was awesome, clarity was good. Loved the interactive basis of the workshop"'' * ''"Very good background and basic explanation, very good commentary on procedures"'' * ''"Good intro, made things very clear"'' * ''"A lot of info, but great job of presenting it clearly"'' * ''"The clarity of the explanation was really good for the allocated time"'' * ''"Information was conveyed at the perfect pace"<<BR>>'' * ''"Excellently executed"'' * ''"Great software! Keep moving forward!!"'' * ''"Food was great! Loved it! Thanks"'' |
* ''"'' |
Line 15: | Line 6: |
Number of participants: '''40'''<<BR>>Number of returned documents: '''31 '''(78%)<<BR>>[[attachment:workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document|&do=get]]. | Number of participants: '''40'''<<BR>>Number of returned documents: '''15 '''(38%)<<BR>>[[attachment:workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document|&do=get]]. |
Line 19: | Line 10: |
* '''Never used: 90%''' * Some simulation work: '''3%''' * Some experimental work: '''3%''' * Experienced user: '''4%''' * N/A: '''3%''' |
* Never used: '''%''' * Some simulation work: '''%''' * Some experimental work: '''%''' * Experienced user: '''%''' * N/A: '''%''' |
Line 25: | Line 16: |
* 1: '''0%''' * 2: '''0%''' * 3: '''6%''' * '''4: 61%''' * '''5: 32%''' |
* 1: '''%''' * 2: '''%''' * 3: '''%''' * 4: '''%''' * 5: '''%''' |
Line 31: | Line 22: |
* Yes: '''42%''' * No: '''52%''' * N/A: '''6%''' |
* Yes: '''%''' * No: '''%''' * N/A: '''%''' |
Line 35: | Line 26: |
* EEG: '''52%''' * MEG: '''87%''' * MEG+EEG: '''51%''' * NIRS: '''0%''' * sEEG/ECoG: '''0%''' * Scripting:''' 66%''' * Pre-processing: '''58%''' * Visualization of recordings: '''58%''' * Source analysis: '''67%''' * Time-frequency: '''58%''' * Functional connectivity: '''71%''' * Statistics: '''39%''' * Research: '''74%''' * Clinical applications: '''29%''' * Epilepsy: '''13%''' * Baby / infant studies: '''3%''' |
* EEG: '''%''' * MEG: '''%''' * MEG+EEG: '''%''' * NIRS: '''%''' * sEEG/ECoG: '''%''' * Scripting:''' %''' * Pre-processing: '''%''' * Visualization of recordings: '''%''' * Source analysis: '''%''' * Time-frequency: '''%''' * Functional connectivity: '''%''' * Statistics: '''%''' * Research: '''%''' * Clinical applications: '''%''' * Epilepsy: '''%''' * Baby / infant studies: '''%''' |
Line 56: | Line 47: |
* '''Very good pace and clarity: 24''' * A bit rushed in the afternoon: 4 * A bit too slow in the morning: 3 * Too much for a day: 4 * Request for a few more breaks: 1 * Section on time-frequency less clear than the others: 1 |
* '''V''' |
Line 65: | Line 50: |
* More on functional connectivity: 3 * More on different inverse methods: 2 * More on forward modeling (BEM): 1 * More on time-frequency: 1 * Clinical applications / epilepsy: 2 * Processing EEG data / ERPs: 2 * Explain which analysis should be used in which research question: 2 * Export TF/connectivity maps to SPSS: 1 * Study of deep brain structures: 1 * Full group analysis: 1 * Would have been better with Neuromag data: 1 * More activities that require critical thinking rather than following along: 1 * How to import external events files: 1 |
* M |
Line 80: | Line 53: |
* '''Development of the functional connectivity: 8''' * Pipeline edition similar to !BrainVision (drag and drop): 2 * Beamformers: 2 * MEG/EEG + fMRI: 2 * Add markers in the imported data: 1 * Easy way to cancel ongoing process: 1 * Better stats: 1 * Allow for behavioral covariates: 1 * Motion correction: 1 |
* '''D''' |
Line 91: | Line 56: |
* Some bugs with the scouts: 5 | * |
Line 100: | Line 65: |
1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1. 4 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 3 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 5 1. 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 0 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 1 1 |
1. 1. 1. |
Brainstorm workshop survey: Neuro 2012
Selected comments from attendees:
"
Survey results
Number of participants: 40
Number of returned documents: 15 (38%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
Never used: %
Some simulation work: %
Some experimental work: %
Experienced user: %
N/A: %
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
1: %
2: %
3: %
4: %
5: %
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
Yes: %
No: %
N/A: %
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
EEG: %
MEG: %
MEG+EEG: %
NIRS: %
sEEG/ECoG: %
Scripting: %
Pre-processing: %
Visualization of recordings: %
Source analysis: %
Time-frequency: %
Functional connectivity: %
Statistics: %
Research: %
Clinical applications: %
Epilepsy: %
Baby / infant studies: %
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
V
Missing topics and requests
- M
Missing tools in Brainstorm
D
Technical issues
Results analysis
Results encoding
- 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
- How helpful: 1(best) to 5(worst), 0=N/A
- Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A