Differences between revisions 1 and 3 (spanning 2 versions)

Brainstorm workshop survey: Neuro 2012

Survey results

Number of participants: 40
Number of returned documents: 15 (38%)
Link to the pdf document.

Summary

Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
- Never used: 87%
- Some simulation work: 0%
- Some experimental work: 13%
- Experienced user: 0%
How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1: 0%
- 2: 0%
- 3: 13%
- 4: 40%
- 5: 47%
Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
- Yes: 33%
- No: 67%
Interested in using Brainstorm for:
- EEG: 53%
- MEG: 93%
- MEG+EEG: 40%
- NIRS: 13%
- sEEG/ECoG: 7%
- Scripting: 7%
- Pre-processing: 20%
- Visualization of recordings: 47%
- Source analysis: 67%
- Time-frequency: 73%
- Functional connectivity: 60%
- Statistics: 40%
- Research: 80%
- Clinical applications: 13%
- Epilepsy: 13%
- Baby / infant studies: 7%

Comments and suggestions

The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.

Comments about the workshop

Very good pace: 9
A bit slow: 1
A bit fast: 4
Too much info / split in two days: 4
Should tell the people to bring a mouse: 1
Give a printed version of the program / analysis steps: 1

Missing topics and requests

Statistics: 1
More EEG / ERPs: 3
More example of studies: 1
More connectivity: 1
More about source localization techniques: 1
Group analysis: 1

Missing tools in Brainstorm

p-values in connectivity analysis: 2
Video tutorials on the website: 1
Phase-synchrony analysis: 1
Multi-variate Granger causality: 1
Multi-subject loops from the GUI: 1
Intra-cranial EEG: 1
Time-variant connectivity measures: 1

Results analysis

Results encoding

1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
How helpful: 1(best) to 5(worst), 0=N/A
Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A

Results values

1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
4 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 3 3 5 5 4
1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1

-  ⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2013-02-18 21:51:21 → 
  Size: 3804
  Editor: agrippa
  Comment:
+   ← Revision 3 as of 2013-02-18 22:17:16 → ⇥
  Size: 2464
  Editor: agrippa
  Comment:
-Deletions are marked like this.
+Additions are marked like this.
 Line 1:
-= Brainstorm workshop survey: Halifax 2013 =
== Selected comments from attendees: ==
 * ''"Really clear and well paced. Good job!"''
 * ''"Pace was awesome, clarity was good. Loved the interactive basis of the workshop"''
 * ''"Very good background and basic explanation, very good commentary on procedures"''
 * ''"Good intro, made things very clear"''
 * ''"A lot of info, but great job of presenting it clearly"''
 * ''"The clarity of the explanation was really good for the allocated time"''
 * ''"Information was conveyed at the perfect pace"<<BR>>''
 * ''"Excellently executed"''
 * ''"Great software! Keep moving forward!!"''
 * ''"Food was great! Loved it! Thanks"''
+= Brainstorm workshop survey: Neuro 2012 =
-Line 15:
+Line 4:
-Number of participants: '''40'''<<BR>>Number of returned documents: '''31 '''(78%)<<BR>>[[attachment:workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document|&do=get]].
+Number of participants: '''40'''<<BR>>Number of returned documents: '''15 '''(38%)<<BR>>[[attachment:workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document|&do=get]].
-Line 19:
+Line 8:
-  * '''Never used: 90%'''
  * Some simulation work: '''3%'''
  * Some experimental work: '''3%'''
  * Experienced user: '''4%'''
  * N/A: '''3%'''
+  * Never used: '''87%'''
  * Some simulation work: '''0%'''
  * Some experimental work: '''13%'''
  * Experienced user: '''0%'''
-Line 27:
+Line 15:
-  * 3: '''6%'''
  * '''4: 61%'''
  * '''5: 32%'''
+  * 3: '''13%'''
  * 4: '''40%'''
  * 5: '''47%'''
-Line 31:
+Line 19:
-  * Yes: '''42%'''
  * No: '''52%'''
  * N/A: '''6%'''
+  * Yes: '''33%'''
  * No: '''67%'''
-Line 35:
+Line 22:
-  * EEG: '''52%'''
  * MEG: '''87%'''
  * MEG+EEG: '''51%'''
  * NIRS: '''0%'''
  * sEEG/ECoG: '''0%'''
  * Scripting:''' 66%'''
  * Pre-processing: '''58%'''
  * Visualization of recordings: '''58%'''
+  * EEG: '''53%'''
  * MEG: '''93%'''
  * MEG+EEG: '''40%'''
  * NIRS: '''13%'''
  * sEEG/ECoG: '''7%'''
  * Scripting:''' 7%'''
  * Pre-processing: '''20%'''
  * Visualization of recordings: '''47%'''
-Line 44:
+Line 31:
-  * Time-frequency: '''58%'''
  * Functional connectivity: '''71%'''
  * Statistics: '''39%'''
  * Research: '''74%'''
  * Clinical applications: '''29%'''
+  * Time-frequency: '''73%'''
  * Functional connectivity: '''60%'''
  * Statistics: '''40%'''
  * Research: '''80%'''
  * Clinical applications: '''13%'''
-Line 50:
+Line 37:
-  * Baby / infant studies: '''3%'''
+  * Baby / infant studies: '''7%'''
-Line 56:
+Line 43:
- * '''Very good pace and clarity: 24'''
 * A bit rushed in the afternoon: 4

 * A bit too slow in the morning: 3
 * Too much for a day: 4
 * Request for a few more breaks: 1
 * Section on time-frequency less clear than the others: 1
+ * Very good pace: 9
 * A bit slow: 1
 * A bit fast: 4
 * Too much info / split in two days: 4
 * Should tell the people to bring a mouse: 1
 * Give a printed version of the program / analysis steps: 1
-Line 65:
+Line 51:
- * More on functional connectivity: 3
 * More on different inverse methods: 2
 * More on forward modeling (BEM): 1
 * More on time-frequency: 1
 * Clinical applications / epilepsy: 2
 * Processing EEG data / ERPs: 2
 * Explain which analysis should be used in which research question: 2
 * Export TF/connectivity maps to SPSS: 1
 * Study of deep brain structures: 1
 * Full group analysis: 1
 * Would have been better with Neuromag data: 1
 * More activities that require critical thinking rather than following along: 1
 * How to import external events files: 1
+ * Statistics: 1
 * More EEG / ERPs: 3
 * More example of studies: 1
 * More connectivity: 1
 * More about source localization techniques: 1
 * Group analysis: 1
-Line 80:
+Line 59:
- * '''Development of the functional connectivity: 8'''
 * Pipeline edition similar to !BrainVision (drag and drop): 2
 * Beamformers: 2
 * MEG/EEG + fMRI: 2
 * Add markers in the imported data: 1
 * Easy way to cancel ongoing process: 1
 * Better stats: 1
 * Allow for behavioral covariates: 1
 * Motion correction: 1
+ * p-values in connectivity analysis: 2
 * Video tutorials on the website: 1
 * Phase-synchrony analysis: 1
 * Multi-variate Granger causality: 1
 * Multi-subject loops from the GUI: 1
 * Intra-cranial EEG: 1
 * Time-variant connectivity measures: 1
-Line 90:
+Line 67:
-== Technical issues ==
 * Some bugs with the scouts: 5
-Line 100:
+Line 76:
-. 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1
 1. 4 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 3 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 5
 1. 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 0 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 1 1
+. 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
 1. 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 3 3 5 5 4
 1. 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1

Software

Users

Development