1837
Comment:
|
← Revision 3 as of 2013-02-18 22:17:16 ⇥
2464
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 2: | Line 2: |
== Selected comments from attendees: == * ''"'' |
|
Line 10: | Line 8: |
* Never used: '''%''' * Some simulation work: '''%''' * Some experimental work: '''%''' * Experienced user: '''%''' * N/A: '''%''' |
* Never used: '''87%''' * Some simulation work: '''0%''' * Some experimental work: '''13%''' * Experienced user: '''0%''' |
Line 16: | Line 13: |
* 1: '''%''' * 2: '''%''' * 3: '''%''' * 4: '''%''' * 5: '''%''' |
* 1: '''0%''' * 2: '''0%''' * 3: '''13%''' * 4: '''40%''' * 5: '''47%''' |
Line 22: | Line 19: |
* Yes: '''%''' * No: '''%''' * N/A: '''%''' |
* Yes: '''33%''' * No: '''67%''' |
Line 26: | Line 22: |
* EEG: '''%''' * MEG: '''%''' * MEG+EEG: '''%''' * NIRS: '''%''' * sEEG/ECoG: '''%''' * Scripting:''' %''' * Pre-processing: '''%''' * Visualization of recordings: '''%''' * Source analysis: '''%''' * Time-frequency: '''%''' * Functional connectivity: '''%''' * Statistics: '''%''' * Research: '''%''' * Clinical applications: '''%''' * Epilepsy: '''%''' * Baby / infant studies: '''%''' |
* EEG: '''53%''' * MEG: '''93%''' * MEG+EEG: '''40%''' * NIRS: '''13%''' * sEEG/ECoG: '''7%''' * Scripting:''' 7%''' * Pre-processing: '''20%''' * Visualization of recordings: '''47%''' * Source analysis: '''67%''' * Time-frequency: '''73%''' * Functional connectivity: '''60%''' * Statistics: '''40%''' * Research: '''80%''' * Clinical applications: '''13%''' * Epilepsy: '''13%''' * Baby / infant studies: '''7%''' |
Line 47: | Line 43: |
* '''V''' | * Very good pace: 9 * A bit slow: 1 * A bit fast: 4 * Too much info / split in two days: 4 * Should tell the people to bring a mouse: 1 * Give a printed version of the program / analysis steps: 1 |
Line 50: | Line 51: |
* M | * Statistics: 1 * More EEG / ERPs: 3 * More example of studies: 1 * More connectivity: 1 * More about source localization techniques: 1 * Group analysis: 1 |
Line 53: | Line 59: |
* '''D''' | * p-values in connectivity analysis: 2 * Video tutorials on the website: 1 * Phase-synchrony analysis: 1 * Multi-variate Granger causality: 1 * Multi-subject loops from the GUI: 1 * Intra-cranial EEG: 1 * Time-variant connectivity measures: 1 |
Line 55: | Line 67: |
== Technical issues == * |
|
Line 65: | Line 76: |
1. 1. 1. |
1. 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 3 3 5 5 4 1. 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 |
Brainstorm workshop survey: Neuro 2012
Survey results
Number of participants: 40
Number of returned documents: 15 (38%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
Never used: 87%
Some simulation work: 0%
Some experimental work: 13%
Experienced user: 0%
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
1: 0%
2: 0%
3: 13%
4: 40%
5: 47%
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
Yes: 33%
No: 67%
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
EEG: 53%
MEG: 93%
MEG+EEG: 40%
NIRS: 13%
sEEG/ECoG: 7%
Scripting: 7%
Pre-processing: 20%
Visualization of recordings: 47%
Source analysis: 67%
Time-frequency: 73%
Functional connectivity: 60%
Statistics: 40%
Research: 80%
Clinical applications: 13%
Epilepsy: 13%
Baby / infant studies: 7%
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
- Very good pace: 9
- A bit slow: 1
- A bit fast: 4
- Too much info / split in two days: 4
- Should tell the people to bring a mouse: 1
- Give a printed version of the program / analysis steps: 1
Missing topics and requests
- Statistics: 1
- More EEG / ERPs: 3
- More example of studies: 1
- More connectivity: 1
- More about source localization techniques: 1
- Group analysis: 1
Missing tools in Brainstorm
- p-values in connectivity analysis: 2
- Video tutorials on the website: 1
- Phase-synchrony analysis: 1
- Multi-variate Granger causality: 1
- Multi-subject loops from the GUI: 1
- Intra-cranial EEG: 1
- Time-variant connectivity measures: 1
Results analysis
Results encoding
- 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
- How helpful: 1(best) to 5(worst), 0=N/A
- Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A
Results values
- 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
- 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 3 3 5 5 4
- 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1